More
News 18K views since yesterday

Economic grievance and Hanson loyalty: unpacking One Nation's vote

Guardian Australia's Back to Back Barries identifies four voter groups, arguing that winning them back requires more than a single message.

Why this story? One of Guardian Australia's most watched videos since yesterday, with 18,320 views.

Back to Back Barries: Dissecting the One Nation voting blocksBack to Back Barries: Dissecting the One Nation voting blocks

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 2:44Ratcliffe describes "Red Meat" voters as driven by cultural conservatism, opposition to immigration and Australia-first nationalism.
  2. 6:55The "Precariats" connect One Nation support to economic insecurity and regional decline, rather than cultural grievance alone.
  3. 11:51"Triple Haters" reject Labor, the Coalition and the Greens; "Hanson Enthusiasts" are introduced at 14:09.
  4. 21:49The pair argue that economic improvement could reduce One Nation's appeal, but cost-of-living relief risks adding to inflation.
  5. 25:34Ratcliffe explains sampling quotas covering regions, age, gender and education in Accent Research's polling.
  6. 28:23A listener questions metropolitan project spending against rural healthcare needs, prompting discussion of regional distrust.

's supporters do not all arrive at the party for the same reason, political scientist Shaun Ratcliffe argues: some prioritise immigration and cultural issues, others economic insecurity, and others herself.

In Guardian Australia's Back to Back Barries, Ratcliffe joins Tony Barry, filling in for Barrie Cassidy, to explain those distinctions and what they mean for Australia's major parties. The episode drew roughly 18,000 views since yesterday.

Their breakdown starts with the group they call "Red Meat": voters Ratcliffe describes as culturally conservative, opposed to immigration and drawn to Australia-first nationalism. He distinguishes them from the "Precariats", whose support he connects to financial pressure, regional decline and a sense that political and business leaders do not work in their interests.

A third group, the "Triple Haters", rejects , the and the . The fourth, "Hanson Enthusiasts", responds to what supporters perceive as Hanson's directness, consistency and authenticity. "She sounds like a real person, and for a lot of voters, they appreciate that," Ratcliffe says.

The practical question is how other parties might regain those voters' trust. Barry and Ratcliffe argue that better economic conditions could weaken One Nation's appeal, while acknowledging that delivering relief is difficult: policies intended to ease living costs can themselves add to inflation.

The discussion also moves beyond voter labels. Ratcliffe explains how Accent Research uses sampling quotas across geography, age, gender and education. A listener's question about rural healthcare versus metropolitan spending then brings the conversation back to a grievance running through the episode: whether people outside major cities believe government resources reach them fairly.

Published on Trari

Where next?

Or follow us on Telegram

The facts
Subscribers
166,000 ▲ 4,000 this week
Channel views, last 7 days
3,685,528
Channel views, pace per day
892,229 (on a normal day: 373,195)
Video published
November 6, 2026
Video views so far
18,320 (less than a day online)
Video views, pace per day
23,993

The numbers

This episode was Guardian Australia's most-watched new upload since yesterday, drawing roughly 18,000 views.

subscribers
166,000
▲ 4,000 in the last 7 days
total views
136,518,131
views per day
892,229
typical day: 373,195
the video
views
18,320
likes
330
comments
126
days online
1
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
As of November 7, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube

💡 Test your knowledge

Which institution is Australia's central bank?