Video taking off 95x its usual first day

Investigator details dated and undated searches on Naresh Bhatt's phone

WUSA9's courtroom footage follows recovered searches about divorce, missing persons and travel, with testimony explaining which records carry timestamps.

Channel:

WUSA9 Story of October 29, 2026Trari Newsroom

Why this story? The video opened at a pace of 92,519 views a day, 95 times a normal first day on this channel (972).

'Can I donate my baby to my friend' Investigator breaks down searches found on Naresh Bhatt's phone

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

0:32Zaimis identifies recovered searches about Virginia divorce law and what happens when a spouse disappears or dies.
3:26The prosecutor asks about searches involving brain diagrams, meat cutters, knife sharpeners and electric hand saws.
13:13Zaimis distinguishes browser records lacking precise dates from entries with system-recorded timestamps.
22:26Questioning turns to August searches about missing-person finding rates, disability benefits in jail and selling cars.
43:58Zaimis confirms that the final set of matching search records came from an iCloud backup.

Digital forensics investigator Katherine Zaimis reads recovered phone searches into the court record, then addresses a distinction that matters to their chronology: some entries have timestamps, while others do not.

The WUSA9 upload shows testimony in the case against Naresh Bhatt concerning his wife Mamta Kafle's disappearance. It drew about 55,000 views in its first ten hours, far beyond the station's usual opening-day audience for regular videos.

Zaimis describes searches recovered from Bhatt's device about divorce in Virginia and what happens when a spouse disappears or dies. Under questioning from the prosecutor, she also identifies searches involving cutting tools, missing-person finding rates and flights to Delhi and Kathmandu.

This is a different source of records from the work-account searches covered earlier, as we reported here. Here, the questioning moves through a forensic examination report and the underlying phone records, rather than simply reading a list of queries.

When the report appears on the courtroom monitor, Zaimis explains the difference between browser-history items without precise dates and entries with system-recorded timestamps. Later, she confirms an August search about missing-person finding rates in Virginia and identifies matching records recovered from an iCloud backup. The testimony gives viewers both the search terms and an account of where those records were found.

Published on Trari