LBC asks what Musk's campaign millions bought in Texas
A new election discussion shifts from the result itself to the limits of billionaire spending and Trump's endorsements.
Why this story? One of the most watched videos since yesterday, with 212,282 views.
Trump and Musk: The two biggest losers
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 0:00The panel examines Musk's financial involvement in the Texas Senate contest.
- 1:51A contributor connects Musk's Texas spending to business interests and potential AI regulation.
- 2:46Campaign footage shows Talarico accusing Musk of trying to buy the Senate seat.
- 4:47The discussion turns to possible Democratic investigations into Musk's leadership of DOGE.
- 6:02Talarico's victory speech credits grassroots support over billionaire spending.
- 6:48A panellist argues that unsuccessful candidate endorsements damaged both Trump and Musk politically.
Elon Musk spent heavily on a Texas Senate contest that Republican Ken Paxton lost. For LBC's election panel, that gap between financial backing and electoral success becomes the central question: how much political influence can money actually deliver?
The discussion, posted today as "Trump and Musk: The two biggest losers", drew about 210,000 views in its first five hours. It adds a spending-focused examination to the Texas result covered earlier, rather than simply replaying the announcement of James Talarico's victory.
LBC describes Musk's Republican campaign spending overall as approaching half a billion dollars. The panel separates out his involvement in Texas, with one contributor arguing that his commercial interests and the prospect of AI regulation help explain his attention to the state. That is the panel's interpretation of his motives.
Talarico supplies the sharpest contrast in footage from the campaign and his victory speech. Before the result, he accuses Musk of trying to buy the seat through campaign advertising. Afterwards, he tells supporters: "We just proved that all the money in the world is no match for the people of Texas."
The discussion also considers possible Democratic investigations into Musk's work leading DOGE under Trump. Its closing verdict reaches beyond the donor: a panellist argues that Trump and Musk suffered politically through their backing of unsuccessful candidates, despite neither appearing on the ballot.
Published on Trari
Where next?
- Channel
- LBC
- Subscribers
- 1,550,000 ▲ 10,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 11,731,993
- Channel views, pace per day
- 1,760,285 (on a normal day: 1,976,189)
- Video published
- November 4, 2026
The numbers
The audience total covers this video's first few hours today, not a full day's viewing.
💡 Test your knowledge
What does DOGE stand for in the Trump administration initiative discussed here?
DOGE was the Department of Government Efficiency, the federal initiative whose leadership by Musk features in the discussion.


