Candace Owens questions who returned to the Losee rooftop
Surveillance comparisons and courtroom testimony anchor an episode that asks about Tyler Robinson without establishing the rooftop figure's identity.
Why this story? 1,264,134 views so far, and here is what is inside it.
EXCLUSIVE 9/10 Footage: Did “Tyler Robinson” Return To The Losee Rooftop? Because Someone Did…
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 6:20Citing Steve Baker, Owens argues that surveillance timing and clothing discrepancies undermine the pipe bomb suspect's identification.
- 13:50Bagley testifies that police had not checked camera footage to verify rooftop visits during the interval discussed.
- 16:30Owens compares stills labeled 12:17 and 12:37, arguing that they depict the same tall individual.
- 18:20Surveillance footage shows a figure returning to the rooftop ledge; the person's identity remains unresolved.
- 20:00Owens follows the figure's rooftop movements and draws attention to a temporary blackout in the footage.
The identity remains unresolved. Candace Owens presents surveillance footage of a figure returning to the Losee rooftop after the September 10 shooting, then asks whether the images fit the account authorities have given.
The central sequence begins about twelve minutes into her October 20 episode. Owens plays Court TV footage of Officer Bagley testifying that police had not reviewed camera footage to verify whether someone visited the rooftop during the interval discussed in court. She then places surveillance stills labeled 12:17 and 12:37 side by side, arguing that they show the same tall individual.
Video shown next depicts a figure returning to the rooftop ledge. Owens follows the person's movements and draws attention to a temporary blackout in the footage. Those images are the basis of her questions, but the comparison does not establish who the person is or answer the title's question about Robinson.
The episode opens with a separate challenge to the identification of a suspect in the Washington pipe bomb case. Citing journalist Steve Baker's work, Owens argues that surveillance timing, clothing and footwear undermine that identification. Her description calls the suspect vindicated; the segment presents her argument rather than a court ruling clearing him.
For viewers looking specifically for the rooftop material, the footage and courtroom discussion occupy the middle stretch, before the show turns to other commentary around the half-hour mark.
Published on Trari
Where next?
- Channel
- Candace Owens
- Subscribers
- 6,070,000 ▼ 10,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 8,633,370
- Channel views, pace per day
- 542,191 (on a normal day: 1,356,536)
- Video published
- October 20, 2026
- Video views so far
- 1,264,134 (6 days online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 15,249 (on a normal day: 441,098)
The numbers
The episode has drawn about 1.3 million views in six days. Its subject, rather than an unusual viewing surge, is the story here.


