News 396K views since yesterday

Judge dismisses complaint against former FBI officials, MS NOW reports

Nicolle Wallace's panel examines the judge's criticism of the prosecution and its failure to establish probable cause before the midterms.

Channel:

MS NOW Story of November 3, 2026Trari Newsroom

Why this story? One of MS NOW's most watched videos since yesterday, with 396,283 views.

Trump Justice Department WHACKED by judge right before midterms for SLOPPY retribution plot

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

0:01Wallace reports that a federal magistrate judge dismissed the complaint against two former FBI officials.
1:46Dilanian says the judge found prosecutors had not established false statements or intentional deception.
4:29Sample argues that the prosecution failed to establish probable cause amid a rush before the midterms.
5:17McCaskill emphasizes that probable cause is a low preliminary threshold and criticizes prosecutors' handling of the case.

A federal magistrate judge in Washington, D.C., has dismissed a criminal complaint against two former FBI officials accused of lying to Congress about Hunter Biden, according to MS NOW's report on Deadline: White House.

Host Nicolle Wallace introduces the decision as a sharp rebuke to the Justice Department. The report says the judge criticized the prosecution as politically motivated and identified critical errors in the complaint.

Justice and intelligence reporter Ken Dilanian explains that the judge found prosecutors had not established that the statements at issue were false or intentionally misleading. Dilanian describes the investigation as rushed, while Wallace connects the timing of the prosecution to the approaching midterm elections.

The discussion then turns to the legal threshold the case failed to clear. Hofstra University law professor James Sample says prosecutors had not established basic probable cause, rather than merely falling short of the much higher standard needed for a conviction. He argues that the push to proceed before the election helps explain the complaint's defects.

Former prosecutor Claire McCaskill makes the same distinction: probable cause is an early hurdle, not proof of guilt at trial. Her criticism centers on prosecutors' professional obligations and the judge's role in enforcing them.

The segment has drawn about 396,000 views since yesterday. Its central legal point is narrower than the upload's combative title: according to the report, the complaint did not meet the threshold required to proceed.

Published on Trari