Taranto argues against a lame-duck exit for Alito and Thomas
Wall Street Journal Opinion's busiest new upload questions both the Senate arithmetic and the consequences for the Supreme Court.
Why this story? The channel's weekly summary: what went up this week, what is drawing views now, and where the channel stands among similar channels.
Alito and Thomas Can’t Retire Now
Would retiring now actually secure replacements for Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas? James Taranto's answer is no guarantee, and he thinks attempting it would carry a political cost even before a confirmation vote.
In "Alito and Thomas Can't Retire Now," the Journal's editorial features editor addresses proposals for the justices to leave during the lame-duck Senate session. "First, a confirmation would not be assured," he says, pointing to the narrow Republican majority and possible defections. His second objection is institutional: he argues that strategically timed retirements would further politicize the court and increase the risk of a future Democratic effort to expand it.
The short commentary drew roughly 65,000 views, making it the most-watched of the channel's fifteen new uploads. Viewers' discussion moves beyond retirement timing to term limits and the size of the court, questions that reach well past Taranto's immediate Senate calculation.
The post-election reckoning also runs through Kim Strassel's All Things conversation with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich. Their subjects include affordability, Iran and what Republican mistakes could mean for the next presidential election. It is another of the channel's strongest sources of viewing momentum, alongside Taranto's clip and the older "Netanyahu Gives Israel One More Surprise."
Wall Street Journal Opinion added about 3,000 subscribers over the week, while daily views are running above their usual level. Among nearby-sized news channels, its weekly viewing sits below The Canadian Press and Guardian Australia but above Guardian Sport. For this channel, the immediate post-election agenda has extended from who governs to who might shape the court.
A justice on the US Supreme Court since 2006, nominated by President George W. Bush.
More on Wikipedia ›A justice on the US Supreme Court since 1991, nominated by President George H. W. Bush to succeed Thurgood Marshall.
More on Wikipedia ›Published on Trari
Where next?
The videos drawing views on Wall Street Journal Opinion right now
WSJ Opinion: Newt Gingrich on Where Republicans Went Wrong--and What …14,843 views · 2026-11-11
WSJ Opinion: What Can Congress Get Down in Its Lame-Duck Session?8,741 views · 2026-11-09
WSJ Opinion: Jim Jordan Is the House GOP's Next Leader / California's…6,997 views · 2026-11-10
WSJ Opinion: Pete Hegseth, 1; House Democrats, 03,713 views · 2026-11-11
Hegseth Impeachment Effort Looks Like a Distraction3,073 views · 2026-11-10
Netanyahu Gives Israel One More Surprise2,935,979 views
- Channel
- Wall Street Journal Opinion
- Subscribers
- 159,000 ▲ 3,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 1,369,293
- Videos published this week
- 15
- Video published
- November 9, 2026
- Video views so far
- 65,498
- Views on its first day
- 12,754
The numbers
Here is the channel's week in views, subscribers and uploads.
💡 Test your knowledge
Which chamber of Congress did Newt Gingrich serve as speaker?
Gingrich served as speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 1999.


