More
A video worth knowing

DeFranco explains why Owens' Macron case continues against her businesses

A jurisdiction ruling removes Owens personally from the Delaware case, but does not settle the claims against her companies.

Why this story? 891,581 views so far, and here is what is inside it.

The Real Reason Candace Owens' Macron Problem Isn't Over & Guess Who Got Charged With Voter FraudThe Real Reason Candace Owens' Macron Problem Isn't Over & Guess Who Got Charged With Voter Fraud

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 8:08Claims against Owens personally are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; claims against her businesses can proceed.
  2. 10:55Tim Pool and Ben Shapiro distinguish the jurisdiction ruling from an exoneration of Owens.
  3. 17:28A cyber incident takes the FEC filing system offline during a pre-election campaign-finance disclosure window.
  4. 20:13Stuart McPhail warns that voters will cast ballots without the full financial picture disclosure law entitles them to.

A dismissal is not always a verdict on what someone said. Philip DeFranco makes that distinction central to his account of the Macrons' defamation case against : the judge's ruling concerns where she can be sued personally, not whether the disputed statements were true.

The segment, beginning about eight minutes into his October 29 show, explains that a Delaware judge dismissed the claims against Owens personally for lack of personal jurisdiction. Claims against her businesses can still proceed. That is the answer to the title's promise that her "Macron Problem Isn't Over."

DeFranco includes responses from Tim Pool and Ben Shapiro, rather than presenting the ruling as a straightforward victory for Owens. Shapiro puts the distinction explicitly: "So no, this is not some sort of exoneration of Candace Owens. This is a personal jurisdiction technical issue."

Later, the show turns to another gap between a legal process and what the public can learn from it. DeFranco reports that a cyber incident took the Federal Election Commission's filing system offline for nearly two days during a pre-election disclosure window, disrupting access to campaign-finance information.

The episode contains paid segments for Squarespace and Vessi. Its campaign-finance section returns to the practical consequence of the outage: voters approaching Election Day without the full spending picture that disclosure rules are meant to provide.

Published on Trari

Where next?

Or follow us on Telegram

The facts
Subscribers
6,650,000
Channel views, last 7 days
5,185,909
Channel views, pace per day
328,611 (on a normal day: 720,224)
Video published
October 29, 2026
Video views so far
891,581 (4 days online)
Video views, pace per day
46,738 (on a normal day: 318,957)

The numbers

The episode's viewing totals sit alongside its likes and comments below.

subscribers
6,650,000
no significant change in the last 7 days
total views
2,666,447,595
views per day
328,611
typical day: 720,224
the video
views
891,581
likes
19,217
comments
1,867
days online
4
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
Valuetainment
7,160,000
Ben Shapiro
6,970,000
Russell Brand
6,610,000
MeidasTouch
6,490,000
As of November 2, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube