More
A video worth knowing

Cohen's midterm update puts Senate toss-ups and polling doubts together

Inside Elections' Jacob Rubashkin explains a wave of ratings changes favoring Democrats, then addresses why favorable polls still deserve scrutiny.

Why this story? 973,398 views so far, and here is what is inside it.

BREAKING: HUGE ELECTION UPDATE on midtermsBREAKING: HUGE ELECTION UPDATE on midterms

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 0:19Rubashkin says all but one of Inside Elections' 64 rating changes favored Democrats.
  2. 2:30Maine, Iowa, Alaska and Kansas are Senate toss-ups; his projection gives Democrats a majority with one win.
  3. 4:08Among independent Senate candidates, Rubashkin identifies Nebraska's Dan Osborn as having the strongest winning chance.
  4. 7:19Rubashkin sees possible Democratic gubernatorial gains in Iowa, Alaska and Ohio.
  5. 12:00Non-response bias and low-quality polls complicate forecasting; implausibly favorable or unfavorable polling warrants scrutiny.
  6. 16:39Early House contests in Virginia and Florida could offer election-night clues to the national trend.

Almost every race-rating change Jacob Rubashkin brings to Brian Tyler Cohen's interview points in the same direction: toward Democrats. But Cohen also asks the question that makes those projections useful rather than merely reassuring: how much confidence should anyone place in the polls behind them?

Rubashkin, deputy editor of , says all but one of its 64 adjustments favored Democrats across House, Senate and gubernatorial contests. His Senate projection puts North Carolina, Ohio and Texas moving toward Democrats, with Maine, Iowa, Alaska and Kansas rated as toss-ups. Under that projection, he says, Democrats need to win one of those toss-ups to secure a Senate majority.

The conversation also looks beyond the major-party nominees. Among the independent Senate candidates discussed, Rubashkin singles out Nebraska's as the one he thinks has a strong chance of winning. He also sees possible Democratic gubernatorial gains in Iowa, Alaska and Ohio.

Cohen's questions about past polling misses give the interview its necessary second half. Rubashkin explains how non-response bias can distort a survey when the people who answer differ from those who do not. He discusses low-quality and fabricated polls, and argues that pollsters may prefer to err on the conservative side rather than appear too favorable to Democrats.

His practical warning is straightforward: polling that seems implausibly good or bad for your preferred side deserves a closer look.

For viewers deciding what to watch first on election night, Rubashkin finishes with early House contests in Virginia and Florida. He identifies those races as potential clues to the national picture, turning Cohen's broad midterm update into a more specific viewing guide.

Published on Trari

Where next?

Or follow us on Telegram

The facts
Subscribers
5,300,000 ▲ 10,000 this week
Channel views, last 7 days
27,050,602
Channel views, pace per day
4,476,699 (on a normal day: 3,467,270)
Video published
November 1, 2026
Video views so far
973,398 (less than a day online)
Video views, pace per day
565,404

The numbers

The interview has drawn nearly a million views. Here is how it sits alongside activity across Brian Tyler Cohen's channel.

subscribers
5,300,000
▲ 10,000 in the last 7 days
total views
5,616,477,057
views per day
4,476,699
typical day: 3,467,270
the video
views
973,398
likes
26,296
comments
1,646
days online
1
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
MeidasTouch
6,490,000
Benny Johnson
6,110,000
Candace Owens
6,070,000
As of November 2, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube

💡 Test your knowledge

Which state is independent Senate candidate Dan Osborn running in?