A 1960 doomsday forecast meets a world of falling birthrates
An Israeli report revisits the population calculation that singled out November 13, 2026, and explains why its assumptions did not hold.
Why this story? One of כאן | חדשות - תאגיד השידור הישראלי's most watched videos since yesterday, with 40,447 views.
כאן | חדשות - תאגיד השידור הישראלי: The news division of Kan, Israel's public broadcaster. 808K subscribers and 1.9B views.
התחזית המדעית משנות השישים: סוף העולם צפוי מחר
Next story: Revolut gets initial approval for an Israeli bank, not an opening date
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 1:03The report explains that the doomsday date comes from a population-growth forecast, not an unfolding catastrophe.
- 1:30A 1960 Science paper identifies November 13, 2026 as the breaking point of its extrapolated population curve.
- 2:14Della Pergola describes the forecast as a warning intended to encourage governments to slow birthrates.
- 2:58Contraception and cultural changes helped slow birthrates, undermining the forecast's trajectory.
- 3:47Della Pergola contrasts Israel's high birthrate with broader declines and forecasts a smaller global population after its peak.
Friday, November 13, 2026 had an ominous appointment in the scientific literature: a population-growth calculation published in 1960 pointed to that date as "Doomsday." But the calculation's trajectory was not humanity's destiny.
Kan News, the news division of Israel's public broadcaster, revisits the prediction in Dov Gil-Har's report, explaining how slowing birthrates undermined an extrapolation of past population growth. The segment opens with television and social-media clips reviving the date, then turns to the science behind it.
The original paper, by Heinz von Foerster and colleagues in the journal Science, carried the striking title "Doomsday: Friday, 13 November, A.D. 2026". Extending the historical growth curve produced a mathematical breaking point: population would become unbounded. That was a warning about where the model led, not evidence that people would literally crush one another on a particular Friday.
Demographer and statistician Professor Sergio Della Pergola explains the underlying concern: a growing population could eventually outstrip available resources. He describes von Foerster's intervention as a well-intentioned warning intended to encourage governments to slow birthrates. The report also notes a personal coincidence: the chosen date fell on the scientist's birthday.
What changed was human behavior. Gil-Har traces declining birthrates from the 1970s onward, linking the shift partly to contraception and cultural changes. A curve fitted to earlier growth could not simply be extended indefinitely once those patterns changed.
Della Pergola says the decline began in the West and identifies Israel as an exception within the developed world, with its highest birthrate. Looking further ahead, he expects the world's population to be smaller in 2100 than in 2080.
The Hebrew upload is titled "התחזית המדעית משנות השישים: סוף העולם צפוי מחר", meaning "The scientific prediction from the sixties: The world is expected to end tomorrow." Published the evening before the named date, it ends with Della Pergola playfully suggesting that Gil-Har wait another night.
An Italian-born Israeli demographer, statistician and professor who specialises in the global Jewish population.
More on Wikipedia ›Published on Trari
Where next?
What do you think?
Want to know when somebody answers you?
- Channel
- כאן | חדשות - תאגיד השידור הישראלי
- Subscribers
- 808,000 ▲ 1,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 6,681,603
- Channel views, pace per day
- 432,187 (on a normal day: 1,071,194)
- Video published
- November 12, 2026
- Video views so far
- 40,447 (less than a day online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 74,211
The numbers
The report drew about 40,000 views since yesterday, placing it among Israel's most-watched new news uploads.
💡 Test your knowledge
Which scientific journal published the 1960 "Doomsday" paper?
The report shows the original paper as it appeared in Science in 1960.


