More
This week on the channel +108K views this week

Daniel ShenSmith questions HMRC access to private AI chats

His only upload of the week examines reported tax-record demands and the legal limits he says apply.

Why this story? The channel's weekly summary: what went up this week, what is drawing views now, and where the channel stands among similar channels.

HMRC Unacceptable Intrusion of Privacy!HMRC Unacceptable Intrusion of Privacy!
What did you think?

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 0:55Telegraph reporting frames the discussion of HMRC seeking digital records, including taxpayers' AI conversations.
  2. 5:25ShenSmith argues that legal professional privilege could provide grounds to resist disclosure of some material.
  3. 6:24Legal advice privilege and litigation privilege protect different categories of communications and records, he explains.
  4. 8:12He examines the statutory restriction on demanding privileged information or documents.
  5. 9:21Requested information must be reasonably required to check a tax position, rather than support a fishing expedition.

Private conversations with an AI assistant are the starting point; the small print of tax law is where Daniel ShenSmith takes the discussion. His only new upload this week, " Unacceptable Intrusion of Privacy!", has passed 105,000 views.

Drawing on reporting in , the barrister examines reports that HMRC wants to inspect taxpayers' AI chat histories when checking tax positions. He then turns to Schedule 36 of the Finance Act 2008, arguing that demands for digital records face limits, rather than giving the tax authority unrestricted access.

The useful distinction is between a request for relevant information and a demand for everything. ShenSmith explains legal advice privilege and litigation privilege, and suggests a taxpayer might be able to assert privilege over some material. That is a qualified argument, not a promise that every AI conversation is protected. As he puts it: "The scope must be reasonably required to check your tax position." The video also includes a sponsored VPN segment.

The new upload is comfortably the channel's busiest video for daily views. October's "This Cannot Be Right!" and September's "Do This NOW to Protect Your House!" continue to attract smaller audiences, keeping the money-and-property archive in the picture.

Across the channel, daily views are running roughly half above their usual level, while subscribers were unchanged over the week. That makes this a week of increased viewing rather than audience expansion, with the fresh HMRC discussion providing its clearest focus.

Published on Trari

Where next?

What do you think?

Add your comment

Or follow us on Telegram

The videos drawing views on Daniel ShenSmith right now

The facts
Subscribers
107,000
Channel views, last 7 days
108,058
Videos published this week
1
Video published
November 11, 2026
Video views so far
105,382
Views on its first day
87,764

The numbers

Here is the week's viewing and subscriber picture for Daniel ShenSmith.

views gained this week: this channel and similar channels
TREX LABS
251,694
subscribers
107,000
no significant change in the last 7 days
total views
6,740,596
views per day
20,632
typical day: 13,943
first-day views of each video posted this week
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
TREX LABS
143,000
I'm Canada
114,000
As of November 14, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube

💡 Test your knowledge

Which newspaper's reporting does ShenSmith discuss in this video?