World news 278K views since yesterday

Shim Woo-jung trial centers on prosecutors' role in martial law

MBC's coverage connects the former prosecutor general's court appearance with an earlier arrest-warrant rejection and scrutiny of his handling of Yoon Suk-yeol's release.

Channel: MBCNEWS ·

South KoreaStory of November 11, 2026Trari Newsroom

Why this story? One of MBCNEWS's most watched videos since yesterday, with 278,331 views.

MBCNEWS: The news division of MBC, a publicly owned South Korean broadcaster. 6.2M subscribers and 32B views.

[속보] '12·3 비상계엄 내란 가담 혐의'.. 심우정 전 검찰총장 첫 재판 출석 - [MBC 뉴스속보] MBC뉴스 2026년 11월 10일

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

0:03MBC reports an earlier rejection of Shim's arrest warrant, citing insufficient grounds concerning flight risk or evidence tampering.
5:01Coverage reviews calls between Park and Shim after martial law was declared and findings from Park's trial.
6:42Reports describe unfinished special counsel investigations being transferred to the police's National Office of Investigation.
12:16The compilation examines the ruling canceling Yoon's detention and Shim's decision not to seek an immediate appeal.
15:13In archival footage, Shim defends allowing Yoon's release as a decision based on due process.
17:05Earlier opposition rallies show demands for impeachment and trials over the martial law crisis.

Whether prosecutors were to be sent to a military-led investigation team is central to the case against South Korea's former prosecutor general, Shim Woo-jung. He attended his first trial at Seoul Central District Court on November 10, South Korea's Munhwa Broadcasting Corporation (MBC) reports.

According to the broadcaster, Shim faces charges of involvement in the insurrection surrounding then-President Yoon Suk-yeol's December 3, 2024 declaration of martial law. Prosecutors allege that, following instructions from then-Justice Minister Park Sung-jae, Shim considered dispatching prosecutors to the martial law command's joint investigation headquarters.

The upload is not simply footage of the first hearing. It combines reports from different stages of the investigation, opening with an earlier court decision rejecting a special counsel request to arrest Shim. MBC says the court found insufficient grounds concerning flight risk or possible evidence tampering. That decision concerned detention, not a verdict on the charges now before the trial court.

The compilation also reviews findings from Park's first-instance trial, including multiple telephone calls between Park and Shim immediately after the martial law declaration. In the court's assessment quoted by the broadcaster, cooperation in supplying personnel was an essential prerequisite for the proposed investigation structure.

A separate strand concerns Shim's decision not to file an immediate appeal against a March ruling canceling Yoon's detention. Footage shows Shim arriving for questioning, while reports revisit why the prosecution allowed Yoon's release without seeking that review.

In archival remarks, Shim defends his decision as one made according to due process and his own judgment. The broadcast contrasts that position with National Court Administration chief Cheon Dae-yeop's view that a higher court should have been asked to examine the ruling.

The final section returns to earlier opposition rallies demanding accountability. Those scenes document the political response at the time, rather than the proceedings at Shim's November trial.

Published on Trari