Raskin puts health care before another Trump impeachment
The Financial Express excerpt opens with Epstein-file questions, but the Maryland Democrat's answer on impeachment turns toward legislative priorities.
Why this story? The video opened at a pace of 239,440 views a day, 60 times a normal first day on this channel (3,989).
Raskin: ‘ENOUGH EVIDENCE ON TRUMP ALONE’ DROPS EPSTEIN BOMBSHELL | Trump Investigation
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 0:00Raskin raises questions about the Epstein files and says they contain evidence connecting Trump.
- 3:42The moderator asks whether Democrats could launch another Trump impeachment inquiry.
- 4:08Raskin says Democrats are not afraid to impeach Trump and reviews the previous proceedings.
- 6:24He says impeachment is not fruitless, while acknowledging the constitutional arithmetic required for conviction.
- 10:18Raskin says restoring people's health care is more important than launching into another impeachment process.
The Financial Express has posted Jamie Raskin's answer to a question facing Democrats after their midterm victory: would they pursue another impeachment of Donald Trump? He does not rule it out, but says restoring health care matters more than beginning a prolonged impeachment process.
The recording comes from a George Washington University post-election discussion, with an on-screen credit to C-SPAN dated November 5. It drew roughly 240,000 views in its first day, about sixty times the channel's usual start for regular videos.
The upload's title foregrounds Raskin's statements about Trump and the Jeffrey Epstein files. In the opening section, he raises questions about the files and accuses the Justice Department of withholding evidence. The discussion then broadens into presidential accountability, with the moderator asking about another impeachment inquiry just before the four-minute mark.
"First of all, we're not afraid to impeach Donald Trump, we've impeached him twice already," Raskin says. He reviews those proceedings and the difficulty of securing a Senate conviction, distinguishing willingness to act from the arithmetic needed to succeed.
His answer is ultimately about priorities rather than a commitment to launch proceedings. Near the end, Raskin says, "...it's much more important for us to get their health care back now than to launch into that process..."
A Democratic U.S. representative for Maryland’s 8th congressional district since 2017. He is also an attorney and law professor.
More on Wikipedia ›The U.S. federal department responsible for enforcing federal laws and administering justice. It is led by Attorney General Todd Blanche.
More on Wikipedia ›Published on Trari
Where next?
- Channel
- The Financial Express
- Subscribers
- 645,000 ▲ 19,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 16,216,855
- Channel views, pace per day
- 2,071,719 (on a normal day: 2,192,777)
- Video published
- November 9, 2026
- Video views so far
- 246,991 (less than a day online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 245,207
The numbers
The Raskin discussion drew an unusually large first-day audience for The Financial Express's regular videos.


