More
Video people are talking about 7.1x its usual comments

Kane's World XI omission prompts a debate about the voters

ESPN FC's panel questions Messi's inclusion, while viewers ask why the players' choices should follow the Ballon d'Or.

Why this story? The video drew 680 comments in its first day, 7.1 times a normal first day on this channel (96).

‘IT MAKES NO SENSE’ Harry Kane becomes 1st Ballon d’Or winner not to make FIFPRO World XI | ESPN FC‘IT MAKES NO SENSE’ Harry Kane becomes 1st Ballon d’Or winner not to make FIFPRO World XI | ESPN FC

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 0:01ESPN presents Kane as the first Ballon d'Or winner omitted from the FIFPRO World XI.
  2. 0:30Nicol would replace Messi with Kane; Hislop later agrees.
  3. 1:47Melchiot suggests admiration for Messi's legacy influenced the players' votes.
  4. 3:20Nicol argues Rice deserved a midfield place ahead of Rodri.
  5. 5:58Robson chooses Rice, Bellingham and Pedri for midfield, prompting Thomas to point out Vitinha's omission.
  6. 8:08Hislop defends David Raya's selection while considering Joan García and Unai Simón.

"I would have Harry Kane over Messi," Steve Nicol says, making his preferred change to the FIFPRO World XI clear almost immediately. Shaka Hislop agrees. In ESPN FC's comment section, though, the discussion turns toward a different question: whose judgment should carry more weight?

The segment examines Kane's omission despite his Ballon d'Or win, with ESPN identifying him as the award's first winner not to make the World XI. Those honors come from different electorates: journalists vote for the Ballon d'Or, while professional players choose the FIFPRO team. Several viewers seize on that distinction, arguing that the players' selections deserve to stand on their own rather than match the other award.

The upload drew about 680 comments in its first day, roughly seven times the channel's usual response to a regular video. Its views were ordinary for ESPN FC. The unusual part was how much there was to discuss beneath it.

Mario Melchiot suggests that admiration for Messi's legacy influenced players' votes. Viewers counter by pointing to international tournament performances, questioning Haaland's place as well as Messi's, and challenging the assumption that Kane's individual award settles the selection argument.

The panel doesn't stop at the forwards. Nicol makes a case for Declan Rice over Rodri, Stewart Robson proposes his own midfield, and Dan Thomas catches an omission in that discussion too: Vitinha, who actually made the team.

Published on Trari

Where next?

What viewers say

  • FIFPRO awards should be more prestigious than Ballon d'Or cos pro footballers vote for the former, exclusively
    @amehgodwin9120See it on YouTube
  • They are calling Messi, what is Halland doing Ahead of Kane

Public comments from the video's page on YouTube

Or follow us on Telegram

The facts
Channel
ESPN FC
Subscribers
5,420,000 ▲ 10,000 this week
Channel views, last 7 days
8,935,016
Channel views, pace per day
657,481 (on a normal day: 1,635,935)
Video published
November 9, 2026
Video views so far
77,579 (2 days online)
Video views, pace per day
59,820

The numbers

The comment section was much busier than usual, even though the video's first-day views were not exceptional for ESPN FC.

comments on the video's first day
usual first day here
96
this video
680
subscribers
5,420,000
▲ 10,000 in the last 7 days
total views
5,141,643,104
views per day
657,481
typical day: 1,635,935
the video
views
77,579
likes
590
comments
763
days online
2
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
ESPN FC
5,420,000
B/R Football
3,820,000
DAZN Football
3,160,000
As of November 11, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube

💡 Test your knowledge

Which club did Harry Kane leave to join Bayern Munich in 2023?