A video worth knowing

Raskin and Crenshaw dispute impeachment and Congress's next steps

CNN's post-election panel separates Democratic leaders' stated priorities from Republican skepticism, then turns to blocked legislation and war powers.

Channel:

CNN Story of November 9, 2026Trari Newsroom

Why this story? 2,493,087 views so far, and here is what is inside it.

'Are you confused?' Dem & GOP reps erupt in shouting match over Congress

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

0:00Raskin says impeachment remains a constitutional option, but argues it is not Democrats' obsession.
2:14Asked about impeachment, Jeffries says no House Democratic Caucus member has raised it with him.
3:22Crenshaw accuses Senate Democrats of blocking bipartisan surveillance, ratepayer protection and insider-trading legislation.
4:22The title's heated exchange begins as the lawmakers dispute election results, war authorization and Trump.
5:22Crenshaw invokes the Senate's 60-vote requirement while challenging Raskin's account of legislative obstruction.
7:53Raskin argues that Trump's war violated Congress's constitutional authority to declare war.

CNN's post-election discussion starts with a distinction Jamie Raskin wants to make: keeping impeachment available is not the same as making it the Democratic agenda.

"So, we're not afraid to impeach him. It's a tool in the constitutional toolkit," the Maryland Democrat says. But a clip introduced by congressional correspondent Manu Raju supplies a different emphasis from House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries: "I haven't had a single member of the House Democratic Caucus talk to me about impeachment."

Texas Republican Dan Crenshaw is unconvinced that Democrats will leave the subject alone. From there, the panel moves beyond the title's promised shouting match to a substantive disagreement about responsibility for congressional inaction.

Crenshaw accuses Senate Democrats of blocking bipartisan measures, citing surveillance reform, ratepayer protections and restrictions on insider trading. He points to the Senate's 60-vote hurdle. Raskin argues that Republicans have missed the election's message and challenges their legislative program.

The exchange also reaches presidential war powers. Raskin argues that Trump took the country into an unconstitutional war, grounding his objection in Congress's authority to declare war.

The sharpest escalation begins around four minutes in, with interruptions and personal jabs increasingly crowding out the answers. By the commercial break, the anchor offers a more generous assessment of the encounter: "I have to say, it is actually nice to hear the debate of issues and ideas..."

Published on Trari