More
A video worth knowing

Jim Cornette's Invasion verdict: too much McMahon, too little WCW

VICE Sports' retrospective argues that a dream wrestling crossover became a family storyline before its biggest attractions could arrive.

Why this story? 915,134 views so far, and here is what is inside it.

Why the Biggest Wrestling Angle of All Time Fell Apart | Cornette Side of the RingWhy the Biggest Wrestling Angle of All Time Fell Apart | Cornette Side of the Ring
What did you think?

6 more stories on WWE ›

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

  1. 0:30WWF's Raw and WCW's Nitro competed for Monday-night viewers before WCW's sale.
  2. 3:10Goldberg-Austin and Sting-Undertaker illustrate the dream matches fans wanted from the crossover.
  3. 4:47Guaranteed Turner contracts allowed major WCW stars to stay home paid instead of joining WWF immediately.
  4. 6:03Cornette argues that inserting the McMahons shifted the storyline from competing promotions to a family dispute.
  5. 7:22His Invasion pay-per-view review contrasts the anticipated star lineup with matches including a referee brawl.
  6. 9:32Cornette argues that the later arrival of WCW's biggest names missed the original crossover moment.

Goldberg against Stone Cold Steve Austin. Sting against The Undertaker. Jim Cornette lays out the matches wrestling fans imagined when WWF bought WCW, then contrasts them with what television actually delivered: Shane and Stephanie McMahon claiming ownership of the invading promotions.

In VICE Sports' Cornette Side of the Ring episode, his argument goes beyond the missing wrestlers. The creative response to their absence, he says, turned a meeting of wrestling worlds into another McMahon family dispute.

The contracts explain the starting problem. Leading WCW performers had guaranteed deals with Turner Broadcasting, allowing them to remain at home and collect their pay rather than immediately join WWF. Cornette argues that buying out those contracts or waiting for the major names would have preserved the attraction. Instead, Shane became WCW's on-screen owner and Stephanie claimed ECW, putting familiar WWF characters at the center of the opposition.

Reviewing the July 2001 Invasion pay-per-view, Cornette delivers his diagnosis: "There was only one problem with the Invasion pay-per-view: no stars." It's his pointed shorthand for the gap between the crossover's promise and a card that found room for a referee brawl.

The comments extend that argument into fantasy booking. Viewers propose Goldberg interrupting Austin and Sting facing The Undertaker; others suggest that delaying the storyline could have allowed a stronger lineup.

Cornette's closing objection is timing. The big names eventually arrived, but separately and later. In his telling, assembling the cast after the original moment had passed couldn't recreate the invasion fans had pictured.

Published on Trari

More on WWE

All stories on WWE ›

Where next?

What viewers say

  • The Invasion always reminded me that scene from Simpsons where they go to see the cast of Bonanza reunited, but only two background actors showed up.
  • Great line on WWE's Monday Night War docuseries: "You had WWF being invaded by the guys from WCW Thunder."
  • Imagine Sting Facing The Undertaker at Wrestlemania instead of Jeff Hardy at Victory Road
    @Lonewolf004See it on YouTube
2 more comments
  • It was 1 year too early. Had Vince waited until summer 2002, he could've had the big names and the Invasion would've been successful
    @stevelinkofficialSee it on YouTube
  • There are four sides of every Ring.
    1- The right side
    2- The wrong side
    3- The Dark side
    And most importantly
    4- The Cornette side!

Public comments from the video's page on YouTube

Or follow us on Telegram

The facts
Subscribers
1,140,000
Channel views, last 7 days
2,096,460
Channel views, pace per day
120,446 (on a normal day: 300,718)
Video published
November 8, 2026
Video views so far
915,134 (5 days online)
Video views, pace per day
49,358 (on a normal day: 250,665)

The numbers

The retrospective has drawn more than 900,000 views since publication. Its subject, rather than an unusual surge in viewing, is the attraction here.

subscribers
1,140,000
no significant change in the last 7 days
total views
304,656,048
views per day
120,446
typical day: 300,718
the video
views
915,134
likes
14,089
comments
1,905
days online
5
subscribers: this channel and similar channels
RocaNews
1,180,000
VICE Sports
1,140,000
As of November 13, 2026 · Data source: Trari Social News, Trari Traffic Trends and Ranking Platform, Google YouTube
Subscriber, view, like and comment counts are YouTube's. Rates, usual days, rankings, comparisons and categories are Trari's own calculations.
Developed with YouTube

💡 Test your knowledge

Which US cable network aired WCW Monday Nitro?