TYT examines Netanyahu's call to investigate soldiers in "Naza"
Cenk Uygur and Ana Kasparian connect the documentary's anonymous testimony to questions about strike approvals and accountability in Gaza.
The Young Turks
Story of Why this story? The video opened at a pace of 446,945 views a day, 6.6 times a normal first day on this channel (67,884).
IDF Gets EXPOSED, Netanyahu FURIOUS
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 1:39An anonymous soldier distinguishes strike authorizations allowing mass casualties from deaths he says were never assessed.
- 2:36Kasparian describes threats against the filmmakers and protests outside Rachel Szor's family home.
- 4:28Kasparian reads Netanyahu's statement calling for investigation and trial of documentary participants.
- 5:51Kasparian cites Yuval Abraham's reporting on automated targeting systems "Lavender" and "Where's Daddy?"
- 16:30Uygur argues that US politicians funding Israeli military actions should also face accountability.
Ana Kasparian reads Benjamin Netanyahu's statement calling for an investigation and trial of participants in "Naza," a documentary featuring anonymous Israeli military whistleblowers. For her and Cenk Uygur, the central question is why those speaking about military actions in Gaza are facing prosecution rather than their testimony prompting accountability.
Their Young Turks segment, titled "IDF Gets EXPOSED, Netanyahu FURIOUS," has passed half a million views, with a first-day audience more than six times the channel's usual. The upload is a news discussion and commentary segment and includes a paid sponsor break.
The documentary excerpt supplies the discussion's most consequential distinction: an anonymous soldier describes authorization for a strike that could kill hundreds of people for a single target, while saying he does not know how many were actually killed because the toll was never assessed. Authorization and a confirmed death toll are not the same thing.
Kasparian identifies Rachel Szor and Yuval Abraham as the film's co-directors and describes threats and protests directed at the filmmakers. She then brings in Abraham's reporting for +972 Magazine on the automated targeting systems "Lavender" and "Where's Daddy?"
The hosts widen their criticism to American political and media institutions. Uygur argues that accountability must also extend to US politicians who fund Israeli military actions, making American responsibility, not just the response to the documentary, the segment's closing concern.
Published on Trari
Where next?
Is this your channel?For the channel's owners and team: a ready picture, text and badge for your audience
Share the story with your audience. Everything is ready:
For an Instagram story or a WhatsApp status
For a community post or your channel's description
For your website
You may use the picture, the badge, and link it to this story.
- Channel
- The Young Turks
- Subscribers
- 6,740,000 ▲ 10,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 9,970,189
- Channel views, pace per day
- 2,528,380 (on a normal day: 1,381,004)
- Video published
- October 14, 2026
- Video views so far
- 504,487 (less than a day online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 459,710
The numbers
The documentary discussion drew a much larger first-day audience than TYT's usual regular upload. Its comment section was also about four times as busy.
