United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Australia
New Zealand
IrelandMatt Fradd's SSPX discussion prompts calls for a priest's reply
Ethan Muse argues for deference to Rome, while viewers ask Fradd to invite someone from the traditionalist society.
Matt Fradd
Story of Why this story? The video drew 936 comments in its first day, 15 times a normal first day on this channel (64).
My Take on the SSPX
Next story: Matt Fradd asks: "Is The Wizard of Oz Demonic?"
Things we can learn from the video
Press to jump
- 0:11Muse advises against attending SSPX chapels, describing the society as being in schism.
- 1:42Muse argues that perceived injustice does not authorize Catholics to create parallel church authorities.
- 4:15He invokes Church indefectibility to reject the idea that its universally promulgated Mass could undermine faith.
- 11:20The discussion pauses for an advertisement.
- 12:33Muse argues that SSPX objections to Vatican II's collegiality teaching misread earlier theology.
- 14:28Fradd argues that appeals to necessity encourage splintering; Muse compares unauthorized church authority to vigilante policing.
Should a Catholic attend an SSPX chapel? Matt Fradd puts the practical question to Ethan Muse, whose answer is immediate: "don't do it."
That exchange opens "My Take on the SSPX," a discussion excerpt that generated nearly fifteen times Fradd's usual first-day comments without an unusual surge in views. A recurring request among the prominent comments is straightforward: bring on an SSPX priest to explain the society's position directly.
The Society of Saint Pius X is a traditionalist Catholic priestly society associated with the older Latin liturgy. But Muse's argument is about more than how Mass is celebrated. He describes the society as being in schism and argues that Catholics have moral safety in submitting to legitimate authorities in Rome, rather than deciding for themselves when to establish a separate authority.
He also invokes the Church's indefectibility: the teaching that it cannot fundamentally fail in its mission. In his account, that rules out the idea that a universally promulgated Mass could itself destroy faith or grace. Later, he disputes SSPX objections to Vatican II's teaching on collegiality, concerning bishops' shared responsibility within the Church.
Fradd adds his own concern that appeals to necessity can justify repeated splintering. In the comments, some viewers emphasize obedience to Rome; others ask for a canon lawyer or a representative of the society. The most specific audience request is not for another discussion about the SSPX, but a discussion with it.
Published on Trari
Where next?
What viewers say
As someone currently in OCIA… let’s hear from the SSPX side please
@reneecrotty6910See it on YouTubeCan we hear arguments from the other side with SSPX priests or traditionalist priests who are also canon lawyers that are supportive of the SSPX?
I feel like when it comes to the SSPX topic on Pints, it’s always in favor of this argument from Ethan.@NTXCatholicGalSee it on YouTube
Public comments from the video's page on YouTube
Is this your channel?For the channel's owners and team: a ready picture and text for your audience
Share the story with your audience. Everything is ready:
For an Instagram story or a WhatsApp status
For a community post or your channel's description
- Channel
- Matt Fradd
- Subscribers
- 893,000 ▲ 3,000 this week
- Channel views, last 7 days
- 2,206,269
- Channel views, pace per day
- 212,435 (on a normal day: 310,308)
- Video published
- November 11, 2026
- Video views so far
- 50,143 (2 days online)
- Video views, pace per day
- 24,988 (on a normal day: 58,173)
The numbers
The unusual activity was in the comments, not the views: the discussion drew a much busier first-day response than Fradd's regular videos typically receive.
💡 Test your knowledge
Which pope opened the Second Vatican Council in 1962?
Pope John XXIII opened Vatican II; his successor, Paul VI, brought the council to its conclusion.