World news 259K views since yesterday

Lavrov rejects temporary truce as Lukashenko predicts war's end

A Ukrainian analysis program contrasts the two leaders' statements, then examines whether Republican election losses could change Washington's approach to Ukraine.

Channel: 24 Kanal ·

UkraineStory of November 9, 2026Trari Newsroom

Why this story? One of 24 Канал's most watched videos since yesterday, with 259,053 views.

24 Канал: A Ukrainian news channel from Lviv, on air since 2006. 9.1M subscribers and 19B views.

⚡СРОЧНОЕ ОБРАЩЕНИЕ Москвы по КОНЦУ ВОЙНЫ! Такого ОТКАЗА не ждал никто: США ГУДЯТ. ЛУЧШЕЕ

Things we can learn from the video

Press to jump

0:00Lavrov rejects a temporary ceasefire and insists on addressing Russia's stated underlying causes of the conflict.
2:42Aslanyan discusses a reported Rosstat hack and argues that official statistics obscure Russian losses and economic problems.
6:47Lukashenko predicts the war will end within months, citing exhaustion and a lack of resources.
20:05Rashkin distinguishes Republicans accountable to voters from officials whose political futures depend on Trump.
25:18Rashkin predicts intensified U.S. pressure on Ukraine before the G20, describing it as pressure for capitulation.
35:18The discussion considers whether blocked Ukraine financial-assistance and lend-lease legislation could return to the Senate.

Russia's foreign minister rejects a temporary ceasefire. Belarus's president says the war could end within months because everyone is exhausted. Those contrasting statements frame a compilation from Ukraine's Channel 24 (24 Канал), which moves from Moscow's negotiating position to the consequences of the U.S. midterm elections.

The opening footage shows Sergei Lavrov, Russia's foreign minister since 2004, insisting that Moscow wants the underlying causes of what he calls the crisis addressed, rather than a temporary halt to fighting. Host Anastasiia Noritsyna asks commentator Sergei Aslanyan why the Kremlin refuses even an energy truce, a limited agreement concerning attacks on energy infrastructure.

Aslanyan argues that Moscow's refusal reflects an objective of destroying Ukraine, rather than a disagreement over the mechanics of a ceasefire. That is his interpretation of Russian policy. He also discusses a reported Belarusian hacker attack on Rosstat, Russia's statistics agency, and argues that concealed losses and unreliable official statistics obscure the country's demographic and economic problems.

The program then plays footage of Alexander Lukashenko, who has led Belarus since 1994, speaking at a conference in Minsk. Lukashenko predicts that the war will end in the coming months, saying the sides lack strength and resources and are tired. Aslanyan questions the prediction's credibility alongside Moscow's rhetoric, but offers a forecast of his own: that the hot phase of the war will end in 2027. Neither statement amounts to an announced ceasefire agreement.

A second discussion, beginning about twelve minutes into the video, pairs host Iryna Uzlova with U.S. political commentator Yuri Rashkin. They examine Republican losses in the midterms, divisions involving Vice President JD Vance, and the limits of President Donald Trump's power after the election. Rashkin distinguishes elected Republicans, who must consider their own voters, from administration officials whose futures depend more directly on Trump.

Rashkin predicts that Trump will intensify pressure on Ukraine over the next two months to secure an agreement he can present as a success around the G20 summit. He characterizes that possible pressure as an attempt to force Ukrainian capitulation and restore Russia's international standing. These are Rashkin's assessments of Trump's intentions, not announced U.S. policy.

The discussion also considers reports of a possible U.S.-Russia-China meeting, with an on-screen Bloomberg headline describing talks about a first trilateral gathering. Rashkin argues that Trump would approach China's Xi Jinping from a weakened negotiating position.

Near the end, Uzlova and Rashkin turn to a more concrete congressional question: whether previously blocked legislation providing financial assistance and lend-lease support for Ukraine could return to the Senate.

Published on Trari